You’ve probably heard Northcote Parkinson’s maxim ‘work expands to fill the time available.’
That’s probably true, but can you imagine trying to get it all on your timesheet?
When it comes to timesheeting, the balance between accuracy and expediency is a delicate one.
You want the information you squeeze out of your data to be accurate and a true reflection of how much time a job has taken and thus, perhaps, how much it has cost (and even how much we will be charging, where relevant).
But you don’t want to spend your life filling in timesheets. Not when we’ve got real, productive work to do. And, as I’ve said before, filling in timesheets isn’t fun – of that we can be sure. Until they invent a way of getting a chocolate muffin to pop out of your CD-Rom tray each time you submit your timesheet it never will be.
So how can we balance the two opposing factions of accuracy vs expediency?
One way is the 15-minute rule.
This is what we do at our office. Most jobs take a minimum of 15 minutes, even if they really only take 5. What? I hear you say.
It’s simple. You may spend 5 minutes and 36 seconds on a telephone call to a customer or colleague, for example.
- You then spend a further 3 minutes noting the outcome of that call (perhaps you create a To Do in Time Manager, a Task in Outlook, or jot something down in a notepad or Post-It).
- Maybe you need to note the conversation against the Project in Time Manager using the Comment facility, or append something in your own Document Management system because of the conversation.
- You then spend another 15 seconds visually locating the Project & Activity combination from your Favourites and dragging it into the correct time slot on your timesheet.
- You then spend another 2-3 minutes getting back to what you were doing before the telephone call.
- But not before you spend a minute talking to the person who sits opposite you.
- Or, since you’ve been disturbed anyway, perhaps you check your e-mails.
- You get the idea…
We guess that, on average, we probably spend at least a minimum of 15 minutes per distinct Activity. That does not mean our timesheet is full of 15 minute chunks, but that we’ve taken the decision not to reduce the time any less than that. We don’t charge that accurately so why record time to any greater precision?
Now the example above doesn’t add up to 15 minutes, I hear the pedants among you say. And you’re right, it doesn’t. But how often do you record that water-cooler chat on your timesheet? Or that trip to the WC? Or that impromptu turn about some anecdote about your children? Or that breezy moment spent wistfully gazing out the window, which however brief, recharges your batteries for the remainder of the day? Or that charitable round of teas and coffees you made? Or that brief but necessary corridor discussion with your line manager about that impeded Project? Or that TIME spent showing a colleague how to do something clever in Excel? Or those moments spent un-jamming the stapler?
All these things make up the rest of the 15 minutes booked throughout the day. Even if the actual Productive task really was 5 minutes.
Conversely, if I spent 1hr39mins on a Crystal Report, I’ll book it as 1hr45mins – multiples of 15 minutes. This saves me time trying to think where to book the balance, when in fact, I probably didn’t start on the button of a 15minute block, often to the credit of the customer and – either way – I will probably have to do some wrap-up or admin tasks around it and other bits and pieces. So the idea works here too.
What is apparent though is that this is EASY.
And if it is EASY it is more likely to work and become second-nature.
Of course, the 15minute example might not apply for all disciplines (for example, a lot of legal users use 6-minute time units and Time Manager allows you to set for yourself both the default time unit block size and the number of blocks to assign against a drag-Favourite action, e.g. 2×15 minute blocks = half an hour etc.), but the point is don’t make time recording any more difficult than the precision by which business decisions will be made based on the output of that data.
So, we find 15 minutes works just fine. Andy Warhol thought so too – maybe in a different way, but he simplified his concept to make it workable.
Next time I’ll talk about refining how we record our time; that is, looking at our protocol for time recording – an often overlooked element of rolling-out a managed approach to time recording.